light 5 of 11
film to megapixels
people compare film to digital in megapixels
it sounds precise
but it misses the point
rough film to digital equivalents
35mm film
around 12 to 24 mp
fine grain film with a good scan
around 30 to 40 mp
high end drum scan
up to 50 mp
medium format film
around 50 to 100 mp
large format film 4×5 inch
around 150 to 300 mp
why estimates vary
film resolution is not fixed
it depends on the film the lens and the scan
some films resolve fine detail
others show more grain and less usable detail
lower iso film resolves more detail
higher iso film shows more grain and less detail
a well scanned 35mm negative often contains around 20 to 24 mp of real detail
this is why 20 mp digital cameras are often compared to 35mm film
not because they are identical
but because they resolve a similar level of detail
the look however is different
why the numbers fall short
megapixels measure detail
they do not measure character
they do not describe grain
they do not explain edge transitions
they do not tell you how an image feels
why film looks different
digital uses a fixed grid of pixels
film uses a random pattern of grain
digital noise feels structured
film grain feels irregular
edges are different too
digital defines them precisely
film transitions are softer
less exact
more gradual
why film can feel more dimensional
film often feels more dimensional
this comes from
grain structure
lens rendering
gentler transitions
together they reduce harshness at the edges of forms
the image feels less brittle
less clinical
more alive
colour
film records colour through layers of emulsion
each film stock responds differently
digital uses a fixed array of colour filters
it aims for consistency
film often produces more distinctive palettes
and subtler blending
digital often looks cleaner
but sometimes less characterful
what matters
resolution tells you how much is there
rendering decides what it feels like
film cannot be reduced to a megapixel number
learn to see that difference
and everything changes